Chaffin v. Brame
North Carolina Supreme Court
64 S.E.2d 276 (1951)
- Written by Dan Lake, JD
Facts
Chaffin (plaintiff) was driving at night when Garland’s automobile approached Chaffin. Garland refused to dim his headlights, causing Chaffin to be temporarily blinded and to collide with Brame’s (defendant) truck, which was unlit and blocking the right lane. Chaffin brought a negligence claim against Brame, who argued that Chaffin was contributorily negligent as a matter of law because Chaffin was unable to stop within the range of his headlights. The trial court refused to rule that Chaffin was guilty of contributory negligence, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Chaffin.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ervin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.