Champlin Exploration, Inc. v. Western Bridge & Steel Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
597 P.2d 1215 (1979)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Champlin Petroleum Company (CPC) (defendant) refined hydrocarbons, but some of the hydrocarbons leaked back into ground. When CPC discovered that its hydrocarbons were leaking, the company took immediate steps to stop the leak and recover those hydrocarbons that had escaped. Eventually, all of the leaks were repaired. Champlin Exploration, Inc. (CEI) (plaintiff) had taken possession of some of CPC’s escaped refined hydrocarbons. CEI brought suit seeking a declaratory judgment that it owned the escaped refined hydrocarbons that it had recaptured from the ground. The trial court ruled in favor of CPC, declining to issue the requested declaratory judgment. CEI appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Doolin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.