Champlin Refining Co. v. Aladdin Petroleum Corp.

205 Okla. 524, 238 P.2d 827, 1 O. & G.R. 93 (1951)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Champlin Refining Co. v. Aladdin Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
205 Okla. 524, 238 P.2d 827, 1 O. & G.R. 93 (1951)

SC

Facts

The State of Oklahoma believed it had title to a property. Relying on this belief, Champlin Refining Company (Champlin) (defendant) bought a mineral lease from Oklahoma on the land. Champlin drilled two producing wells and one non-producing well. Subsequently, in a separate proceeding, the trial court determined that Oklahoma never had title to the property. As a result, the trial court ordered that Champlin’s producing wells be turned over to Aladdin Petroleum Company (Aladdin) and Phillips Petroleum Company (Phillips) (plaintiffs), the actual owners. In accordance with the court order, Champlin turned over the wells and paid the plaintiffs the market value of the minerals produced from the wells on the date of production, minus the costs of drilling and operation. The plaintiffs then brought a conversion suit against Champlin, seeking the highest market value of the minerals between the time of the conversion and the time of trial, as opposed to the market value at the time of production, which Champlin had already paid. The conversion suit was filed five years after the conversion of Aladdin’s property and 17 months after the conversion of Phillips’s property. At all times, Champlin acted in good faith. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that Champlin’s compensation to the plaintiffs should be the highest market value of the minerals between the time of conversion and the time of trial, minus the costs of drilling and operation. The trial court also found that Champlin could not offset its payment using costs associated with the nonproducing well. Champlin appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

Dissent (Luttrell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership