Chandler v. Otto

693 P.2d 71 (1984)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chandler v. Otto

Supreme Court of Washington
693 P.2d 71 (1984)

JL

Facts

The City of Moses Lake (the city) requested bids for the handling of solid waste. The city received seven bids. The lowest two bids failed to comply with the requirement that each page of the bid proposal be signed. The Moses Lake City Council declined to waive the irregularities by a vote of four to three and then awarded the bid to the third-lowest bidder, Lakeside Disposal. The bid was $180,000 more than the lowest bid. A recall petition was filed against the four councilmen (defendants) who had voted to award the contract to Lakeside Disposal. The petition alleged that the actions of the councilmen constituted an abuse of discretion. Pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) § 29.82, the trial court held a hearing to determine whether the charges were sufficient. The trial court ruled that the charges were sufficient, and the councilmen appealed to the Supreme Court of Washington.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pearson, J.)

Dissent (Dore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legislation and Regulation

Key Terms