Chemical Residential Mortgage v. Rector
Florida District Court of Appeal
742 So. 2d 300 (1998)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Terry Rector (defendant) took out a mortgage from Chemical Residential Mortgage (CRM) (plaintiff). After Rector defaulted, CRM filed a foreclosure action. CRM’s complaint specifically alleged that (1) CRM was both the owner and the holder of the mortgage, with the right to collect and enforce payment from Rector; and (2) Rector had defaulted on his mortgage obligations. Rector failed to timely respond to CRM’s foreclosure complaint, thereby waiving his right to deny the allegations made therein. A final judgment of foreclosure was entered in 1995, then amended in 1996. In 1997, CRM moved to amend the final judgment again and to reset the sale date for the foreclosed property. The trial court denied CRM’s motion to amend and vacated both the 1996 amended final judgment and the 1995 original final judgment of foreclosure on the basis that CRM had failed to attach the required copy of the recorded mortgage as an exhibit to the underlying foreclosure complaint. CRM appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barfield, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.