Idaho Supreme Court
693 P.2d 1031 (1984)
On February 10, 1977, Ernest Cheney (Cheney) (plaintiff) entered into a contract with Blaine and Nita Jemmett (Jemmett) (defendant) for the sale of property. The agreement contained an anti-assignment clause unless Cheney consented to the assignment. A few months later, Jemmett sought approval for assignment of Jemmett’s interest to Douglas Honn (Honn). Cheney refused. As a result, Jemmett drafted a rental agreement that Jemmett and Honn signed. Cheney sued stating that Jemmett was in violation of the anti-assignment clause. The trial court granted Jemmett’s motion for dismissal stating that Cheney acted arbitrarily in denying his consent to the assignment. Cheney appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Donaldson, C.J.)
Concurrence (Bistline, J.)
Dissent (Bakes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.