Cheng-Canindin v. Renaissance Hotel Associates

57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 867 (1996)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cheng-Canindin v. Renaissance Hotel Associates

California Court of Appeal
57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 867 (1996)

EP

Facts

Georgina Cheng-Canindin (Cheng) (plaintiff) sued the owners and management of the Parc Fifty Five Hotel (hotel) (defendant) for wrongful termination. In response, two hotel defendants filed a petition with the trial court seeking to compel Cheng to arbitrate her claims through the hotel’s Review Committee (committee) and to stay court proceedings pending resolution by the committee. The hotel argued that while employed, Cheng acknowledged receipt of its employee handbook in which Cheng agreed to submit all disputes related to her employment to the committee, which would make a final, binding decision on the issue. The committee would consist of hotel employees and managers from outside Cheng’s department, with the general manager serving as the swing vote, if needed, and deciding whether employees could testify. The hotel claimed that the committee process was unbiased and that Cheng waived her right to litigate claims related to her employment. Based on the language in the handbook, Cheng argued that the committee process was optional and voluntary, not requiring her to submit to arbitration. The trial court denied the hotel’s petition to compel arbitration. The hotel appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haerle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership