Cherry v. McCall
Texas Court of Appeals
138 S.W.3d 35 (2004)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Robert Cherry and Maria Cherry (plaintiffs) purchased a home from Brian McCall and Rebekah McCall (defendants). The contract for the purchase of the home stated that the Cherrys were buying the property “as is” from the McCalls. After the purchase was completed, the Cherrys discovered a walled-in room in the basement. The room was contaminated with mold and was filled with trash, including plumbing fixtures, boards, pipes, rocks, and used building materials. The Cherrys sued the McCalls, seeking a declaratory judgment that either (1) the McCalls breached the contract or (2) the existence of the hidden room qualified as a mutual mistake justifying rescission of the contract. The trial court granted summary judgment to the McCalls, and the Cherrys appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Angelini, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.