Cherry v. McCall
Texas Court of Appeals
138 S.W.3d 35 (2004)
Robert Cherry and Maria Cherry (plaintiffs) purchased a home from Brian McCall and Rebekah McCall (defendants). The contract for the purchase of the home stated that the Cherrys were buying the property “as is” from the McCalls. After the purchase was completed, the Cherrys discovered a walled-in room in the basement. The room was contaminated with mold and was filled with trash, including plumbing fixtures, boards, pipes, rocks, and used building materials. The Cherrys sued the McCalls, seeking a declaratory judgment that either (1) the McCalls breached the contract or (2) the existence of the hidden room qualified as a mutual mistake justifying rescission of the contract. The trial court granted summary judgment to the McCalls, and the Cherrys appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Angelini, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.