Christopher v. Duffy
Court of Appeals of Massachusetts
28 Mass. App. Ct. 780 (1990)
- Written by Shelby Crawford, JD
Facts
The Christopher family lived in an apartment that contained a dangerous amount of lead. The daughter (Janette) got lead poisoning. The owners of the apartment hired Duffy (defendant) to remove the lead. Duffy’s efforts allegedly increased the family’s exposure to lead. Janette died of pneumonia that she was unable to fight off in her weak condition. The mother (plaintiff) sued the apartment’s owners, former owner, and Duffy for violation of various statutes and regulations and for wrongful death. The owners and former owner settled with Christopher. Christopher then moved to amend her complaint by dropping the original defendants except Duffy and adding five lead manufacturing companies and a trade association as defendants. The judge denied Christopher’s motion to amend. Christopher filed a petition for relief from that denial of her motion to amend. Her petition was denied. Christopher appealed the denial of her petition. The Court of Appeals denied her petition and affirmed the judge’s decision to deny Christopher’s motion to amend her complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.