Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group
United States Supreme Court
508 U.S. 10 (1993)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The Section 8 program was a federal program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (defendant) that provided financial assistance to low-income individuals so that they could rent housing from private landlords. Rents for Section 8 housing were adjusted regularly on the basis of a formula. HUD determined that the formula-based rent adjustments made under the Section 8 program far exceeded the market rents for comparable housing outside the Section 8 program. HUD thus decided that the market rents would serve as a cap limiting the amount of the formula-based rent adjustments. A group of landlords (the landlords) (defendants) who agreed to lease apartment units to Section 8 tenants brought suit against HUD, contending that they were entitled to formula-based rent adjustments made without regard to the market rents. The district court ruled in favor of the landlords, and the court of appeals affirmed. HUD appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.