Citicorp Mortgage Inc. v. Pessin
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey
570 A.2d 481 (1990)
Citigroup Mortgage Inc. (Citigroup) (plaintiff) held the first mortgage on a property. Rudy Grillo held a second, subordinate mortgage on the property. Grillo assigned the second mortgage to Steven Pessin (defendant). The assignment was recorded on October 16, 1987. On October 19, 1987, Citigroup foreclosed on the first mortgage, naming Grillo and the mortgagor as defendants. Citigroup’s foreclosure action was dated October 13, 1987. Citigroup was unaware of Pessin’s interest and did not notify Pessin of the foreclosure action. Citigroup commenced a strict foreclosure proceeding seeking to extinguish Pessin’s interest. The trial court granted Pessin the right to redeem the property by paying the outstanding debt to Citigroup within 60 days. Pessin appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Petrella, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.