Citizens Association of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
925 A.2d 585 (2007)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
After the District of Columbia Court of Appeals issued its opinion in President and Directors of Georgetown College v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, the case was remanded to the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) (defendant) for further proceedings. On remand, the BZA approved Georgetown College’s request to increase its enrollment cap to 6,016, with the allowance that Georgetown determine compliance with the cap by averaging its fall and spring enrollment. The BZA also eliminated certain provisions from the Original Campus Plan that were uncontested by Georgetown. The Citizens Association of Georgetown (CAG) (plaintiff) opposed both the cap increase and the removal of uncontested provisions from the Original Campus Plan. CAG filed a lawsuit contesting the BZA’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Washington, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.