Citizens for Preservation of Waterman Lake v. Davis
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
420 A.2d 53 (1980)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
The Town of Glocester (the Town) (plaintiff) entered into a contract that permitted Davis (defendant) to use certain property in the Town as a commercial dump. Davis used the property as a dump and contracted with third parties to permit the dumping of garbage from neighboring towns in the dump. Additionally, Davis allegedly dumped garbage in areas on the property designated as wetlands. Citizens for Preservation of Waterman Lake (Citizens) (plaintiff) brought suit in Rhode Island state court against Davis. Citizens alleged that Davis’ operation of the dump violated the Fresh Water Wetlands Act (wetlands act) and created a nuisance. The Town intervened as a plaintiff and alleged that Davis violated certain town ordinances by accepting garbage from other surrounding towns. The trial court ruled in favor of Davis on all counts, and Citizens and the Town appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bevilacqua, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.