City of Attalla v. Dean Sausage Co.

889 So. 2d 559 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Attalla v. Dean Sausage Co.

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
889 So. 2d 559 (2003)

Facts

The sewer system in the city of Attalla (the city) (defendant) was operated by the city. The city provided sewer service to persons and businesses located outside the city’s corporate limits but within the city’s police jurisdiction. These businesses included Dean Sausage Company, Inc., Machine Products Company, Inc., and Trambeam, Inc. (the businesses) (plaintiffs). The city’s sewer system was experiencing overflows, such that the city had to raise funds to pay for rehabilitating the sewer system. The city did not collect any taxes in its police jurisdiction. Thus, the city requested that the businesses consider voluntary annexation into the city in order to help the city secure the tax revenues needed to rehabilitate the sewer system. The businesses disregarded this request. Subsequently, in an effort to reduce expenses, the city enacted Ordinance 758(01), which terminated sewer service in its police jurisdiction. The businesses brought suit, contending that the city was required to provide sewer service in its police jurisdiction. The trial court ruled in favor of the businesses. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pittman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership