City of Auburn v. Hedlund
Supreme Court of Washington
201 P.3d 315 (2009)
- Written by Walter Machniki, JD
Facts
Hedlund (defendant) hosted a party where many people were drinking to excess and a camcorder was being passed around in order to show the debauchery of the night. After Hedlund’s mother came home, she had everybody leave the house, and one of the drunken individuals at the party got behind the wheel. With the camera still depicting the actions during the ride, the intoxicated driver hit a concrete barrier, killing everyone in the car except for Hedlund, who experienced severe injuries herself. After months of recovery and rehabilitation in the hospital, Hedlund was charged as an accomplice to driving under the influence (DUI) for her actions that night. The trial court convicted Hedlund, but the court of appeals reversed her conviction based on unrelated cumulative errors. The City of Auburn appealed this reversal to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chambers, J.)
Dissent (Madsen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.