City of Auburn v. Hedlund

201 P.3d 315 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Auburn v. Hedlund

Supreme Court of Washington
201 P.3d 315 (2009)

Facts

Hedlund (defendant) hosted a party where many people were drinking to excess and a camcorder was being passed around in order to show the debauchery of the night. After Hedlund’s mother came home, she had everybody leave the house, and one of the drunken individuals at the party got behind the wheel. With the camera still depicting the actions during the ride, the intoxicated driver hit a concrete barrier, killing everyone in the car except for Hedlund, who experienced severe injuries herself. After months of recovery and rehabilitation in the hospital, Hedlund was charged as an accomplice to driving under the influence (DUI) for her actions that night. The trial court convicted Hedlund, but the court of appeals reversed her conviction based on unrelated cumulative errors. The City of Auburn appealed this reversal to the Supreme Court of Washington.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chambers, J.)

Dissent (Madsen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership