City of Bedford v. James Leffel & Co.

558 F.2d 216 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Bedford v. James Leffel & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
558 F.2d 216 (1977)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The City of Bedford, Virginia, (plaintiff) purchased two hydroelectric turbines from James Leffel & Company (Leffel) (defendant). The two turbines were installed at the city’s hydroelectric plant in 1969. One turbine failed to perform upon installation, and the other turbine started deteriorating after about three years. From the time the problems began, Leffel helped with repair and remediation efforts to no avail until 1975. Over this time, Leffel made repeated assurances and attempts to sort out the problems with the performance of the turbines. The relationship between the city and Leffel soured after the city threatened litigation in 1974. The city ultimately filed suit against Leffel in 1975. The statute of limitations for contract actions was four years. Leffel filed a motion for summary judgment, pleading statute of limitations as a defense. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Leffel. The city appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Russell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership