City of Calexico v. Bergeson

64 Cal. App. 5th 180, 278 Cal. Rptr. 3d 470 (2021)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Calexico v. Bergeson

California Court of Appeal
64 Cal. App. 5th 180, 278 Cal. Rptr. 3d 470 (2021)

KD

Facts

Hearing officer Robert Bergeson upheld the termination of police officer Rudy Alarcon (plaintiff) by the City of Calexico (city) (defendant). Alarcon and the city both filed petitions for writ of mandate with the superior court challenging Bergeson’s decision. On September 24, 2019, the superior court entered a written order and ruling denying both petitions. The order fully disposed of all matters and did not contemplate any further action, such as preparation of another order or judgment. The clerk mailed a file-endorsed copy of the order and a declaration of mailing to both parties on September 24. On November 7, Alarcon filed a notice of appeal from the order. On November 21, the superior court entered a judgment incorporating the grounds set forth in its September 24 order. The city served Alarcon with notice of the entry of that judgment on November 22. The clerk mailed the city notice of Alarcon’s appeal no later than December 3. The city filed a notice of cross- appeal on January 21, 2020. Acting sua sponte, the California Court of Appeal addressed whether the city’s notice of cross-appeal was timely.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Aaron, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership