City of Kansas City v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
861 F.2d 739 (1988)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (defendant) provided annual funding to state and local governments. The City of Kansas City, Missouri (the city) (plaintiff) was a recipient of CDBG funds and used CDBG funds from 1978 to 1985 to improve sidewalks in certain areas of the city. The city assessed property owners for the cost of improving the sidewalks in front of their homes. HUD prohibited this type of assessment and ordered the city to reimburse the property owners for the improper assessments. The city refused to comply with HUD’s order. Fearing that HUD planned to withhold the city’s 1987 CDBG funds, the city filed suit, seeking to compel HUD to distribute the full amount of the funds. Later, HUD conditioned a portion of the city’s 1987 CDBG funds on the city’s repayment of the assessments. The district court determined that HUD was required to provide the city with an opportunity for a hearing before imposing the condition. HUD appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edwards, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.