City of Klamath Falls v. Bell
Oregon Court of Appeals
490 P.2d 515 (1971)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Fred Schallock and Floy Daggett were the two shareholders of a corporation that owned land in the City of Klamath Falls (the city) (plaintiff). The corporation gifted the land to the city so long as the land was used for a library. Per the conveyancing deed, if the land ceased to be used as a library, then title passed to Schallock and Daggett or their heirs and assigns. The city operated a library for over 40 years. When the library closed, the corporation had been dissolved, and Schallock and Daggett had died. The city sued their heirs, Constance Bell, Marijane Flitcraft, and Caroline Crapo (defendants), seeking a declaration regarding the land’s ownership. Bell and Crapo conveyed any interest in the property to Flitcraft. The trial court concluded that the heirs’ executory interest was void under the rule against perpetuities and declared the city to hold fee simple title. The heirs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schwab, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.