City of Milwaukee v. NL Industries

691 N.W.2d 888 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Milwaukee v. NL Industries

Wisconsin Court of Appeals
691 N.W.2d 888 (2004)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

NL Industries, Inc., and Mautz Paint (collectively, the companies) (defendants) produced and sold lead-based paint throughout the city of Milwaukee (the city) (plaintiff). By 1998, the city faced a public health crisis, with one in five children suffering from lead poisoning. In response, the city filed an action in Wisconsin state court against the companies on theories of public nuisance, conspiracy, and restitution. Although the city conceded that it could not link the companies’ paint with the homes in which the children experienced lead poisoning, the city produced evidence through letters and statements made by officials of the companies that the companies worked together to continue selling their paint despite knowing it contained high levels of lead. The city claimed that the companies’ actions resulted in the creation of a public nuisance and constituted a conspiracy. The companies moved for summary judgment on the ground that the city was unable to demonstrate that the companies had caused the children’s lead poisoning. The trial court granted the motions. The matter was appealed to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kessler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership