City of Rye v. Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of New York
315 N.E.2d 458 (1974)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
The City of Rye (Rye) (plaintiff) hired Public Service Mutual Insurance Company (Public Service) (defendant), developers, to construct six luxury apartment buildings. The contract between Rye and Public Service required Public Service to post a $100,000 bond and to pay $200 per day for each day after April 1, 1971 that the six buildings were not completed. Rye had no statutory authority for imposing this bond on Public Service. Due to changes in the market, Public Service was unable to obtain the necessary financing to complete the buildings on time. After the buildings were 500 days late, Rye brought suit in New York state court against Public Service seeking the full value of the bond. The trial court denied Rye’s motion for summary judgment, and the appellate court affirmed. The appellate court concluded that the bond was penal in nature and thus was unenforceable. Rye appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breitel, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.