Clarett v. National Football League
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
369 F.3d 124 (2004)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Maurice Clarett (plaintiff) filed suit against the National Football League (NFL) (defendant) alleging that its eligibility requirement that a player wait three full football seasons after high school graduation before entering the draft violated antitrust laws. The district court held for Clarett and concluded that the draft’s eligibility rules are not immune from antitrust scrutiny under the non-statutory labor exemption. The NFL appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.