Clausen v. Storage Tank Development Corp.

21 F.3d 1181 (1994)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Clausen v. Storage Tank Development Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
21 F.3d 1181 (1994)

SC
Play video

Facts

In 1989, Eric Clausen (plaintiff) worked for the Goudreau Construction Corporation (Goudreau). While on the job, Clausen slipped on a ramp at a fuel terminal facility, injuring himself. The facility was owned by Storage Tank Development Corporation (Storage Tank) (defendant) and occupied by Sea-3, Inc. (Sea-3) (defendant). Clausen brought a negligence suit against the defendants. The defendants filed third-party suits against Goudreau and disputed which entity had controlled the ramp at the time of Clausen’s injury. Clausen sought to introduce evidence that Storage Tank, at Sea-3’s request, replaced the ramp with stairs in 1992. The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire admitted the evidence as evidence of Storage Tank’s control over the ramp. The trial judge instructed the jury not to use the ramp replacement as evidence of any negligent conduct on the part of the defendants. The jury found in favor of Clausen. Storage Tank appealed, arguing that the admission of the evidence of its replacement of the ramp was in error.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership