Clay v. Security Trust Co.
Kentucky Court of Appeals
252 S.W.2d 906 (1952)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
James Clay was survived by his half-brothers, Matthew Clay and Neal Clay (defendants), and his sister, Laura Clay Macey. James’s will left the residue of his estate to Laura. The will provided that upon Laura’s death, the remainder should be held in trust for Laura’s son, John Macey, until he turned 35. The will allowed for trust income to be paid to John before he turned 35. John predeceased Laura before he turned 35. Security Trust Company (plaintiff), the trustee, filed a petition seeking construction of the will. The trial court ruled that John’s interest was a vested interest. Matthew and Neal appealed, arguing that John’s interest was contingent upon his turning 35 and that because this contingency did not occur, the reminder should pass through intestacy laws.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duncan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
