Cloutier v. GoJet Airlines, LLC

357 F. Supp. 3d 675 (2019)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cloutier v. GoJet Airlines, LLC

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
357 F. Supp. 3d 675 (2019)

Facts

Pilot John Cloutier (plaintiff) sued his former employer, GoJet Airlines, LLC (GoJet) (defendant), alleging that GoJet terminated him because of his disability, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Cloutier sought backpay compensating him for lost wages between his termination and the time of judgment. GoJet argued that backpay should be significantly reduced because Cloutier failed to properly mitigate his damages. In 2014, Cloutier was offered a job with Republic Airways (Republic). However, Cloutier did not accept the offer because it required him to execute a promissory note agreeing to pay Republic $25,000 if he left the company within two years. In 2015, Cloutier began working for SkyWest at a rate lower than his GoJet compensation. In April 2017, when Cloutier’s suit had been pending for 17 months, GoJet offered to reinstate Cloutier to his former captain position with the same compensation and benefits. The offer did not require Cloutier to drop his ADA action. However, it required Cloutier to complete the Federal Aviation Administration training program, unless he received exemptions. Cloutier, who cared for a disabled son, would have struggled to be away from home for the three-to-four-week training period. Additionally, if Cloutier returned to GoJet, he would be working under the people whose prior conduct was the basis of his ongoing suit. Cloutier declined GoJet’s offer. Based on the evidence, GoJet argued that backpay should be reduced by the amount Cloutier earned at SkyWest and the amount he could have earned at Republic from 2014 to 2015. GoJet further argued that Cloutier could not recover backpay after May 2017 because he rejected the reinstatement offer. The district court considered GoJet’s arguments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership