From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Coach Leatherware Co. v. AnnTaylor, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
933 F.2d 162 (1991)
Coach Leatherware Co. (Coach) (plaintiff) was the producer of high-quality leather handbags sold exclusively under its own label. Coach did not have registered trademarks for its handbag designs. On each handbag, Coach attached a distinctive leather tag embossed with “Coach Leatherware” and suspended by a beaded brass chain. Coach had a registered trademark for its tag design, which had become valuable as an upscale symbol. Coach learned that AnnTaylor, Inc. (AnnTaylor) (defendant), a chain of retail stores for professionals, was replicating and selling three of Coach’s classic handbag designs. The imitation handbags had leather tags attached by beaded brass chains; the tags were embossed with AnnTaylor’s name in a different typeface from the Coach tags. Coach brought suit against AnnTaylor in the district court and claimed trade-dress infringement in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act. Coach moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent AnnTaylor from replicating Coach’s handbag designs. AnnTaylor moved for summary judgment and argued that the Coach handbag features had not acquired the secondary meaning required to support a claim for trade-dress infringement. The district court, on its own initiative, granted summary judgment in favor of Coach on the trade-dress-infringement claim. The district court determined that AnnTaylor’s handbags were similar to the Coach handbag designs and likely to cause consumer confusion. The district court found AnnTaylor liable for trade-dress infringement and permanently enjoined AnnTaylor from copying any of the Coach handbag designs.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.