Coach Leatherware Co. v. AnnTaylor, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
933 F.2d 162 (1991)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Coach Leatherware Co. (Coach) (plaintiff) was the producer of high-quality leather handbags sold exclusively under its own label. Coach did not have registered trademarks for its handbag designs. On each handbag, Coach attached a distinctive leather tag embossed with “Coach Leatherware” and suspended by a beaded brass chain. Coach had a registered trademark for its tag design, which had become valuable as an upscale symbol. Coach learned that AnnTaylor, Inc. (AnnTaylor) (defendant), a chain of retail stores for professionals, was replicating and selling three of Coach’s classic handbag designs. The imitation handbags had leather tags attached by beaded brass chains; the tags were embossed with AnnTaylor’s name in a different typeface from the Coach tags. Coach brought suit against AnnTaylor in the district court and claimed trade-dress infringement in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act. Coach moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent AnnTaylor from replicating Coach’s handbag designs. AnnTaylor moved for summary judgment and argued that the Coach handbag features had not acquired the secondary meaning required to support a claim for trade-dress infringement. The district court, on its own initiative, granted summary judgment in favor of Coach on the trade-dress-infringement claim. The district court determined that AnnTaylor’s handbags were similar to the Coach handbag designs and likely to cause consumer confusion. The district court found AnnTaylor liable for trade-dress infringement and permanently enjoined AnnTaylor from copying any of the Coach handbag designs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.