Coastal Conservation Commission v. Gutierrez
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
2005 WL 2850325 (2005)
- Written by Deanna Curl, JD
Facts
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act (the act), in 1983, the secretary of commerce (the secretary) (defendant) approved the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish Resources (Reef Fish FMP). The Reef Fish FMP was designed to rebuild overfished reef-fish stocks to stable levels and was implemented through amendments regulating fish quotas, bag limits, and other limitations. In 2000, based on 1997 red grouper stock levels, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) determined that red grouper had been overfished. To address the overfishing, the secretary submitted proposed Secretarial Amendment 1 to the Reef Fish FMP. A 2002 stock assessment determined that red grouper stock was no longer overfished but had not yet attained continuous maximum sustainable yield. Secretarial Amendment 1 was revised and promulgated in 2004, indicating that measures were still needed to restore red grouper stock within 10 years. Pursuant to Secretarial Amendment 1, the NMFS published a rule imposing a recreational-bag limit and a commercial-catch weight limit on red grouper in 2004. In 2005, after recreational red grouper catch levels remained consistently high, the NMFS published an interim rule further reducing the red grouper bag limit, imposing an aggregate grouper bag limit for all groupers, and closing recreational fishing for all grouper species in the Gulf of Mexico for two months. The Coastal Conservation Association and Fishing Rights Alliance (the fishing groups) (plaintiff) challenged the aggregate grouper bag limit and two-month recreational closure for all grouper species.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Steele, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.