Cobbs v. Grant
California Supreme Court
502 P.2d 1 (1972)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Cobbs (plaintiff) had a stomach ulcer. Dr. Dudley Grant (defendant) told Cobbs that he needed to undergo surgery. Grant discussed the nature of the surgery with Cobbs but did not inform Cobbs about any of the risks associated with the surgery, including spleen injuries and subsequent ulcers. Cobbs underwent the surgery to remove the ulcer, but the surgery resulted in two additional surgeries, one to remove Cobbs’s spleen and one to remove part of Cobbs’s stomach due to an additional ulcer. Cobbs brought a medical-malpractice suit against Grant. The trial court framed its jury instructions in terms of technical battery, rather than negligence. The jury found in favor of Cobbs. Grant appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.