From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...
Cole v. Richardson
United States Supreme Court
405 U.S. 676 (1972)
Richardson (plaintiff) was hired as a researcher for a public hospital of which Cole (defendant) was the superintendent. After being hired, Richardson was asked to take a loyalty oath required of all state employees. The oath required Richardson to swear to support the state and federal constitutions and to oppose the overthrow of the state and federal governments. Richardson believed the oath was unconstitutional and refused to subscribe to it. Richardson was fired and filed suit in federal court. The district court found the support clause of the oath constitutional, but held that the clause pledging opposition to government overthrow was unconstitutionally vague. Cole petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 140,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.