Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Coats and Coats Rental Amusement

629 S.E.2d 635 (2006)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Coats and Coats Rental Amusement

South Carolina Supreme Court
629 S.E.2d 635 (2006)

Play video

Facts

Collins Entertainment Corporation (Collins) (plaintiff) contracted to lease video-poker machines to two bingo-hall operations, Shipwatch Bingo (Shipwatch) and Ponderosa Bingo (Ponderosa), which were owned by Coats and Coats Rental Amusement (defendant). The six-year lease required that any purchaser of the bingo halls’ premises assume the lease. American Bingo and Gaming Corporation (American) (defendant) bought the bingo halls’ assets but refused to assume the lease. Collins brought suit for intentional interference with contract. The suit was referred to a master in equity for trial. American argued that Collins had found other contracts for the machines. Collins presented evidence that it had ample machines for its other contracts in addition to the original leases for Shipwatch and Ponderosa, and could have benefited from all of those contracts had American not breached. The master in equity found for Collins, awarding actual and punitive damages. American appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the master’s award, applying the lost-volume-seller doctrine, which states that if an injured seller would have entered into a subsequent contract even if the first contract had not been breached and would therefore have had the benefit of both contracts, the subsequent contract is not a substitute for the first. American argued that the court of appeals erred in adopting and applying the lost-volume-seller doctrine because the doctrine eliminated the seller’s duty to mitigate damages. The Supreme Court of South Carolina granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Waller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership