Commercial National Bank of Little Rock v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

451 F.2d 86 (1971)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commercial National Bank of Little Rock v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
451 F.2d 86 (1971)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Under the Bank Holding Act of 1956, national banks and bank holding companies had to abide by state restrictions regarding branch banking. The First Arkansas Bankstock Corporation (the company) was a one-bank holding company. The company owned Worthen Bank and Trust Company (Worthen). The company sought to acquire Arkansas First National Bank, so it applied to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the board) (defendants) for permission to become a bank holding company. The company and Worthen were both located in Little Rock, Arkansas, and Arkansas First was located in Hot Springs, Arkansas, which was a significant distance away from Little Rock. The company planned for some future cooperation between the two banks, Worthen and Arkansas First, but the two banks were to stay independent. The two banks would continue to have separate boards of directors, their own capital and loan limits, independent management, and distinct operations. The United States Comptroller of the Currency recommended approval of the company’s application. However, several banks, including Commercial National Bank of Little Rock (plaintiff) filed protests against the company’s application. The board held a public presentation regarding the application and ultimately approved the company’s application to become a bank holding company. Four of the protesting banks (plaintiffs) filed a petition for review of the board’s order that approved the application. The protesting banks argued that Arkansas branch-banking laws prohibited bank holding companies from owning or controlling more than one bank and thus the Bank Holding Company Act applied to the company to restrict it from owning or controlling more than one branch bank within Arkansas.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heaney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership