From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Commissioner of Competition v. Superior Propane Inc.
Canadian Competition Tribunal
2000 Canada Comp. Trib. 16 (2002)
- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Superior Propane Inc. (Superior) (defendant) wanted to merge with another propane exporter. Economic estimates concluded that the merger would raise propane prices by 8 percent, with some price increases affecting foreign customers. The Commissioner of Competition (commissioner) (plaintiff) commenced an action in Canada’s Competition Tribunal, objecting to the horizontal merger on the basis that any efficiencies the merger created would not outweigh the harm resulting from the increased price of propane.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
