Commonwealth v. Alger
Massachusetts Supreme Court
61 Mass. 53 (1851)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Cyrus Alger (defendant) owned waterfront property on a cove. He built a wharf on the tidal flats in front of his property, from the high- to low-tide mark. The wharf crossed a line delineated by statute around Boston harbor, which prohibited riparian owners from building any permanent structures over that line. The state indicted Alger, even though the wharf did not obstruct navigation. The municipal judge saw the potentially important legal issues presented and referred the case to the Massachusetts Supreme Court for consideration.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shaw, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.