Commonwealth v. Brown

No. 40 EAP 2016, 2018 Pa. LEXIS 2766 (2018)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Commonwealth v. Brown

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
No. 40 EAP 2016, 2018 Pa. LEXIS 2766 (2018)

SC

Facts

Darnell Brown (defendant) was charged with killing Cory Morton. Pennsylvania law required an autopsy to be conducted when a death was not by natural causes, for purposes of determining whether the death was the result of a crime. Dr. Marlon Osbourne conducted the autopsy on Morton. The autopsy report found that Morton was shot four times. By the time of Brown’s trial, Osbourne was no longer working at the medical examiner’s office where he conducted the autopsy. The prosecution (plaintiff) called Dr. Albert Chu as an expert witness. Chu presented his independent opinion on the cause of death, based on reviewing Osbourne’s report and the autopsy photographs. Chu had not participated in the autopsy. Brown objected to the introduction of the testimony and photographs. The trial court overruled Brown’s objections, admitting the autopsy report, the autopsy photographs, and Chu’s testimony into evidence. Brown was convicted, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dougherty, J.)

Concurrence (Donohue, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms