Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
Pennsylvania Superior Court
109 A.3d 711 (2015)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
David Gonzalez (defendant) met KM, a cerebral palsy patient, on a Christian dating website. The two met up to watch a movie at Gonzalez’s home. Gonzalez and KM eventually started kissing on the couch and touching while clothed. Gonzalez asked whether KM wanted to go to the bedroom, and KM agreed. KM assumed that the bedroom activities would include only continued kissing and clothed touching because she had told Gonzalez that she did not want to have sex until marriage. Once in the bedroom, Gonzalez took KM’s crutches and put them out of reach, making it impossible for KM to get up from the bed due to her condition. Gonzales then removed KM’s clothing and laid on top of her. KM told Gonzalez not to continue, but Gonzalez instead moved her legs into position for him to engage in sexual penetration. Due to the cerebral palsy, KM was unable to move her legs in resistance and repeatedly called out in pain. After the incident, Gonzalez was charged with and convicted of rape. Gonzalez appealed the conviction to the Pennsylvania Superior Court, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to show the force required by Pennsylvania’s rape statute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jenkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.