Commonwealth v. Huggins

836 A.2d 862 (2003)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,100+ case briefs...

Commonwealth v. Huggins

Pennsylvania Supreme Court

836 A.2d 862 (2003)

Facts

Huggins (defendant) was driving a Ford passenger van through the Pocono Mountains one clear and sunny late afternoon when, by his own admission, he fell asleep and collided with another vehicle. There were 24 occupants in the 15-passenger van, including Huggins and 21 children. Because the van had only 15 passenger seats, some of the passengers were crowded into seats, while others were seated on the floor. At the time of the collision, none of the passengers were wearing a seatbelt, and Huggins was travelling at approximately 78 mph in a 55-mph zone. As a result of the collision, two of the children died and numerous others suffered injuries. After his preliminary hearing, Huggins appealed on grounds that the commonwealth failed to establish a prima facie case of involuntary manslaughter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Castille, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,100 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership