Commonwealth v. McCloskey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
341 A.2d 500 (1975)
Shortly after midnight, an alarm went off at Luzerne County Prison, alerting guards that a prisoner was attempting to escape from the recreation area. The alarm was only audible in the guard’s office. The guards immediately checked the inmates, but no prisoners were found missing. Investigation revealed that someone had cut a piece of barbed wire in the area where the alarm went off. The guards also found a bag filled with civilian clothing. The guards later determined the bag belonged to McCloskey (defendant). McCloskey approached one of the guards and confessed that he had planned on breaking out of prison that night, but decided against it when he thought about the consequences. McCloskey was convicted of attempted prison breach, and he appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hoffman, J.)
Concurrence (Cercone, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.