Compagnie Noga d'Importation et Deportation S.A. v. Russian Federation

361 F.3d 676 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Compagnie Noga d'Importation et Deportation S.A. v. Russian Federation

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
361 F.3d 676 (2004)

Facts

Compagnie Noga d’Importation et Deportation, S.A. (Noga) (plaintiff) entered into supply contracts to provide hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of food and consumer goods to the Government of Russia (the Government), an organ of the Russian Federation (defendant). Noga agreed to finance the agreements in part, with a series of hundreds of millions of dollars in loans to the Government. The loan agreement contained an arbitration clause, which included a waiver of immunity with respect to the enforcement of any arbitration award and a consent to suit in the United States. A dispute arose, and Noga commenced arbitration proceedings against the Russian Federation , claiming that the Russian Federation was in default on the loans. The Russian Federation objected by stating that it was not the proper party to the arbitration, because the Government and the government agencies—not the Russian Federation itself—were parties to the loans in question. The arbitration panel never ruled on the Russian Federation’s objection, and the arbitration proceeded for eight years. Throughout the arbitration, the Government—and not the Russian Federation—participated in the proceedings. The arbitral tribunal issued an award in favor of Noga, but neither the Government nor the Russian Federation paid it. Noga commenced proceedings against the Russian Federation in United States district court to enforce the award. The Russian Federation argued that it was not the proper party to the action, because it was not a party to the arbitration. The district court declined to confirm the award on the ground that the Russian Federation was not a party to the arbitration. Noga appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership