Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Comptoir d'Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S/A v. Luis de Ridder Limitada (The Julia)

[1949] A.C. 293

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Comptoir d'Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S/A v. Luis de Ridder Limitada (The Julia)

House of Lords

[1949] A.C. 293

Facts

Comptoir d’Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge (Boerenbond) (plaintiff) arranged for the purchase and shipment of 500 tons of rye to Antwerp, Belgium from a seller, Luis de Ridder Limitada (Ridder) (defendant). Boerenbond made a full payment of $5,000 to Ridder’s agent, Belgian Grain, and received the delivery order. In order to take delivery of the goods, a multi-step procedure was required. The delivery order would be given to Boerenbond’s agent, along with money for freight charges. Both would be delivered to Belgian Grain, which would endorse the delivery order and return it to Boerenbond’s agent. The delivery order would then be taken to Ridder’s agent, Van Bree, who would keep the order and authorize delivery to himself. However, the rye would not be released from the ship until the captain issued a release document to Van Bree, who would then allow Boerenbond’s agent to take possession. The ship never arrived in Antwerp due to a German invasion. Instead, the ship sold the rye in Lisbon, Portugal at a reduced price. Boerenbond demanded the return of the full $5,000, but Ridder would only agree to return the amount realized from the sale in Lisbon. In an arbitration dispute, Boerenbond claimed that there was a complete failure to perform on the contract. The umpire of the arbitration dispute found that Ridder had performed under the contract because the delivery order was delivered to Boerenbond. The court of first instance and the court of appeals upheld the umpire’s ruling. Boerenbond appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Porter, J.)

Concurrence (Normand, J.)

Concurrence (Simonds, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership