ConAgra, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

708 F. Supp. 257 (1989)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

ConAgra, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
708 F. Supp. 257 (1989)

RW

Facts

ConAgra, Inc. (plaintiff) filed a federal-court suit against Tyson Foods, Inc. (Tyson) (defendant) in connection with the two companies’ contest for control of the Holly Farms Corporation. Tyson filed a counterclaim for preliminary injunctive relief, alleging that ConAgra’s press release constituted a proxy solicitation. Tyson further alleged that ConAgra’s press release failed to comply with the proxy-solicitation requirements of § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its implementing Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 14a-3 because the release was not mailed to Holly Farms’ shareholders and because the release omitted certain information that proxy solicitations were required to include. ConAgra responded that the press release was meant only to inform the public about important corporate developments, made no mention of proxy votes, and was issued before any shareholders’ meeting had been scheduled.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Mergers and Acquisitions

Key Terms