Consolidated Data Terminals v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc.

708 F.2d 385 (1983)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Consolidated Data Terminals v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
708 F.2d 385 (1983)

JL

Facts

Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc. (ADDS) (defendant) manufactured computer equipment, including cathode-ray computer terminals. In 1976, ADDS entered into an agreement with Consolidated Data Terminals (CDT) (plaintiff), which distributed such computer terminals. Under the agreement, CDT acted as a distributor of ADDS’s computer terminals. In late 1977, CDT began ordering the latest version of the computer terminals, the Regent 100, which was supposedly the most advanced version. ADDS provided documentation that the Regent 100s would operate at a relatively high speed of 19,200 baud and claimed that they were inherently reliable. However, the Regent 100s had many problems and significantly underperformed in speed. Eventually, ADDS changed the specifications down to 1,900 baud. CDT sued ADDS, alleging a breach of warranty. ADDS asserted that its contract disclaimed all warranties except for a 90-day guarantee covering materials and workmanship. After a trial, the district court ruled for CDT, and ADDS appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 780,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership