From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Consumer Advocate Division v. Tennessee Regulatory Authority
Tennessee Court of Appeals
1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 428 (1998)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The Tennessee Regulatory Authority (TRA) (defendant) approved rate increases for the Nashville Gas Company. TRA staff members who played no adversarial role in the case furnished ex parte advice to the agency heads. The TRA’s Consumer Advocate Division (CAD) (plaintiff) moved for discovery of these communications. The TRA denied the CAD’s motion for discovery. The CAD appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cantrell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
