Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Gordon

819 F.3d 1179 (2016)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Gordon

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
819 F.3d 1179 (2016)

RW

Facts

Chance Gordon (defendant), a lawyer, solicited clients through official-looking mailings that intentionally and falsely implied that Gordon was affiliated with the federal government, could renegotiate his clients' mortgaged-secured loans, and could protect clients from foreclosure. Gordon promised he would work for his clients on a pro bono basis, but in reality, clients had to pay for Gordon's services. The federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (plaintiff) sued Gordon, alleging that Gordon's actions were unfair and deceptive practices that violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFBA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531, 5536, and the CFPA's implementing regulation, Regulation O (12 C.F.R. §§ 1015.1--1015.11). Gordon responded that all his clients signed representation agreements that accurately described the services he would perform on their behalf, thereby curing any deceptive marketing practices he conducted. The federal district court judge found that Gordon's attempts to evade punishment undermined his "sincere assurances" to refrain from illegal behavior, and that Gordon presented a risk of future harm to consumers. The judge rejected certain remedies proposed by the CFPB as too harsh. Nevertheless, the judge granted the CFPB's motion for summary judgment; ordered Gordon to pay restitution for the unjust gains he derived from all his clients, even those who were satisfied with his services; and enjoined Gordon from practicing law for three years. Gordon appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Owens, J.)

Dissent (Ikuta, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 735,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership