Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp.

443 F.3d 1032 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
443 F.3d 1032 (2006)

  • Written by Tiffany Hester, JD

Facts

In Minnesota, Conwed Corporation (plaintiff) manufactured ceiling tiles using asbestos supplied by Union Carbide Corporation (defendant). After Conwed’s employees contracted diseases due to working with asbestos, Conwed paid workers’-compensation benefits. The employees filed and settled a product-liability tort claim against Union. Conwed then filed a subrogation action against Union, seeking reimbursement for the paid and payable workers’-compensation benefits. At trial, the jury determined a total-damages award and found Conwed and Union at fault for the employees’ diseases. The district court then held that Conwed could recover the lesser of the jury award reduced by Conwed’s fault percentage or the paid and payable benefits reduced by Conwed’s fault percentage. Conwed appealed, arguing that Conwed was entitled to recover the reduced jury award up to the full amount of paid and payable workers’-compensation benefits.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Colloton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership