Copp v. Breskin
Washington Court of Appeals
782 P.2d 1104 (1989)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
At the time the law firm of Breskin & Robbins (firm) (defendant) contracted with Harley Copp (plaintiff) to provide expert testimony on behalf of the firm’s named client, the firm informed Copp that the client would be personally liable for paying Copp’s expert-witness fee. The client refused to pay. The firm offered to sue the client on Copp’s behalf, with no mention of charging Copp a fee to do so. Eventually, the firm sued the client on the firm’s own behalf. Copp sued the firm. The trial court entered judgment for Copp. The firm appealed to the Washington Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Webster, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.