From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Copper Valley Machine Works, Inc. v. Andrus
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
653 F.2d 595 (1981)
On January 1, 1976, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) granted a permit to Copper Valley Machine Works, Inc. (Copper Valley) (plaintiff) for drilling in Alaska. The permit limited drilling to the winter season in order to protect the drilling area’s permafrost character. Copper Valley obtained a two-year lease extension with an expiration date of January 31, 1978. Eleven days prior to the lease’s expiration, Copper Valley requested a 12-month extension to compensate for its 1976 and 1977 summer operation shutdowns. Secretary of the Interior Cecil Andrus (secretary) (defendant) denied the extension. Copper Valley sued the secretary in district court, claiming that § 39 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (Act), 30 U.S.C. § 209, mandated a lease extension. Specifically, Copper Valley argued that the permit’s seasonal restriction was a “suspension of operations and production” in the interest of conservation, mandating a lease extension under the Act. Section 39 provided that if the secretary suspended operations and production under a lease in the interest of conservation, the lease term would be extended to a term equal to the suspension. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The district court rejected Copper Valley’s argument and granted summary judgment to the secretary. Copper Valley appealed. The secretary argued that (1) § 39 applied only to unanticipated drilling interruptions and (2) Copper Valley’s interpretation of § 39 would double lease terms and therefore conflict with 30 U.S.C. § 226(e), which limited lease terms to 10 years with the possibility of a single two-year extension.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (MacKinnon, J.)
Concurrence (Pratt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.