County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co., Inc.

233 P.3d 1169 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co., Inc.

Arizona Court of Appeals
233 P.3d 1169 (2010)

SC

Facts

The County of La Paz (the county) (defendant) contracted to permit Yakima Compost Co. (Yakima) (plaintiff) to process sewage on county land for 25 years. The contract stated that Yakima could perform the work on the county landfill for a maximum of three years. The agreement required the county to act diligently to find a new location for the remaining 22 years, but the agreement stated that if the county did not find a new location within that three-year window, it could terminate the agreement. The county did not find a new location within three years and terminated the agreement. Yakima sued the county for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. At trial, Yakima presented evidence that county officials had changed their minds about the wisdom of the contract and were seeking ways to get out of it. The jury returned a $9.2 million verdict in favor of Yakima. The county appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Timmer, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership