Coursey v. Caterpillar, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
64 F.3d 662 (1995) (Unpublished)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Coursey (plaintiff) entered into a contract to purchase a tractor from Caterpillar, Inc. (Caterpillar) (defendant). The contract between the parties contained an express warranty providing for the repair and replacement of parts in the event of mechanical failure. The contract also contained a clause excluding Caterpillar from liability for consequential damages. Coursey brought suit against Caterpillar in federal district court, arguing that the clause excluding Caterpillar from liability for consequential damages was unconscionable. The trial court granted Caterpillar’s motion for summary judgment, and Coursey appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curium)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.