Covington & Burling v. Food and Nutrition Service
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
744 F. Supp. 314 (1990)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) (defendant) imposed a food-stamp quality-control error-rate penalty against Utah. Utah sought a waiver of the penalty, citing uncontrollable factors that increased the error rate. FNS granted the waiver only in part. Utah requested a review of the remaining penalty by the State Food Stamp Appeals Board (the board). Utah filed a motion to compel FNS to produce particular documents related to the penalty determination. The board instructed FNS to produce the documents but notified Utah’s representation, Covington & Burling (C&B) (plaintiff), that the board was not empowered to compel production by FNS. Thereafter, C&B requested 108 documents from FNS pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FNS released most of the documents in redacted form, withholding 11 documents in their entirety. C&B sued, contending that FNS withheld documents in violation of FOIA. FNS moved for summary judgment, submitting an index describing each withheld document, explaining FNS’s decision-making process about the penalty determination, and detailing why each document was withheld.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harris, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
