Cripe v. Leiter

184 Ill.2d 185, 703 N.Ed.2d 100, 234 Ill. Dec. 488 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cripe v. Leiter

Illinois Supreme Court
184 Ill.2d 185, 703 N.Ed.2d 100, 234 Ill. Dec. 488 (1998)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Roberta Schmitz retained attorney Thomas Leiter of the Leiter Group (collectively, Leiter) (defendants) to represent her in transferring two trusts left by her deceased husband. The new bank was appointed successor trustee, and Leiter was appointed the trusts’ attorney. Mrs. Schmitz’s daughter, Roberta Cripe (plaintiff) filed a petition to be appointed Schmitz’s guardian. Schmitz retained Leiter to represent her in the guardianship proceeding. The guardianship petition was dismissed. After Schmitz moved, Cripe was appointed Schmitz’s guardian. Cripe filed an action against Leiter, alleging among other claims that Leiter violated Illinois’s Consumer Fraud Act (the CFA or the act) by charging excessive and unreasonable fees. The court held that the CFA did not apply to legal services or the billing of legal services and dismissed the CFA counts. The appellate court reversed, holding that the CFA was applicable to the commercial aspects of legal practice, which include billing. Leiter was granted leave to appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bilandic, J.)

Dissent (Harrison, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership